From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jul 29 13:25:05 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5F50A2E8 for ; Tue, 29 Jul 2014 13:25:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smarthost1.sentex.ca (smarthost1.sentex.ca [IPv6:2607:f3e0:0:1::12]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "smarthost.sentex.ca", Issuer "smarthost.sentex.ca" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 263852F66 for ; Tue, 29 Jul 2014 13:25:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [IPv6:2607:f3e0:0:4:f025:8813:7603:7e4a] (saphire3.sentex.ca [IPv6:2607:f3e0:0:4:f025:8813:7603:7e4a]) by smarthost1.sentex.ca (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id s6TDP095058497; Tue, 29 Jul 2014 09:25:00 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from mike@sentex.net) Message-ID: <53D7A0AA.3090200@sentex.net> Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2014 09:24:58 -0400 From: Mike Tancsa Organization: Sentex Communications User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Karl Pielorz , freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD 10.0-R connected to Cisco switch (in 'trunk' mode with native VLAN) - doesn't work? References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.74 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2014 13:25:05 -0000 On 7/29/2014 9:02 AM, Karl Pielorz wrote: > Switch side - the port is configured with: > > switchport trunk encapsulation dot1q > switchport trunk native vlan 2000 > switchport trunk allowed vlan 2000,2200-2300 > switchport mode trunk Would it not be better to have switchport trunk allowed vlan 2200-2300 otherwise its not clear to me what would be tagged and what would not be tagged as vlan 2000, no ? Do you really need to send a mix of tagged and untagged frames on the port ? ---Mike -- ------------------- Mike Tancsa, tel +1 519 651 3400 Sentex Communications, mike@sentex.net Providing Internet services since 1994 www.sentex.net Cambridge, Ontario Canada http://www.tancsa.com/