Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 29 Jul 2014 09:24:58 -0400
From:      Mike Tancsa <mike@sentex.net>
To:        Karl Pielorz <kpielorz_lst@tdx.co.uk>, freebsd-net@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: FreeBSD 10.0-R connected to Cisco switch (in 'trunk' mode with native VLAN) - doesn't work?
Message-ID:  <53D7A0AA.3090200@sentex.net>
In-Reply-To: <E1661C199E3F6229F54C4F72@Mail-PC.tdx.co.uk>
References:  <E1661C199E3F6229F54C4F72@Mail-PC.tdx.co.uk>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 7/29/2014 9:02 AM, Karl Pielorz wrote:
> Switch side - the port is configured with:
>
> switchport trunk encapsulation dot1q
> switchport trunk native vlan 2000
> switchport trunk allowed vlan 2000,2200-2300
> switchport mode trunk

Would it not be better to have

switchport trunk allowed vlan 2200-2300

otherwise its not clear to me what would be tagged and what would not be 
tagged as vlan 2000, no ?  Do you really need to send a mix of tagged 
and untagged frames on the port ?


	---Mike

-- 
-------------------
Mike Tancsa, tel +1 519 651 3400
Sentex Communications, mike@sentex.net
Providing Internet services since 1994 www.sentex.net
Cambridge, Ontario Canada   http://www.tancsa.com/



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?53D7A0AA.3090200>