Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 19 Jan 2022 09:41:09 +0000
From:      bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org
To:        ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   [Bug 226983] print/texlive-full: Missing dependency with SOURCE=ON: print/texlive-texmf-source
Message-ID:  <bug-226983-7788-LMvLLfN5TG@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-226983-7788@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
References:  <bug-226983-7788@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D226983

Rainer Hurling <rhurlin@FreeBSD.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
 Attachment #231152|                            |maintainer-approval?(tex@Fr
              Flags|                            |eeBSD.org)

--- Comment #8 from Rainer Hurling <rhurlin@FreeBSD.org> ---
Created attachment 231152
  --> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=3D231152&action=
=3Dedit
Mk/bsd.tex.mk: make TEX=3Dsource depend on an existing file

> One thing I wonder is: wouldn't it be better to leave the version out of =
bsd.tex.mk
> altogether? I just added it because there are other version checks as wel=
l, but
> somehow, that looks like a fragile thing to do (will be forgotten on upda=
tes anyways)?

It seems, Poudriere behaves right without a version also.

> Wait, now I get you say it's the *other* way around. With my patch, the d=
ependency
> will be on version 20150523 (or later), and that *is* the actual version =
of the
> texlive-texmf-source package. So,I don't see why this would not work? Tha=
t's strange!


Since I'm not sure if it makes sense at all to put a package instead of a f=
ile
into the _DEPS line (all other _DEPS always contain concrete files), I tried
another approach:

I picked out a file from the filelist of print/texlive-texmf-source which is
most likely to be permanently included in the package and used it in
Mk/bsd.tex.mk instead of .keep_me. And lo and behold, that seems to work
without any problems.

Probably this approach is more in the spirit of the framework. But it would=
 be
good if someone else from the tex team could say something about it.

--=20
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.=



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-226983-7788-LMvLLfN5TG>