From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jul 29 16:00:06 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9337E16A418; Sun, 29 Jul 2007 16:00:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from remko@FreeBSD.org) Received: from galain.elvandar.org (redqueen.elvandar.org [217.148.169.55]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 47B2513C468; Sun, 29 Jul 2007 16:00:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from remko@FreeBSD.org) Received: from evilcoder.xs4all.nl ([195.64.94.120] helo=elvandar.local) by galain.elvandar.org with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1IFA1L-000CTG-If; Sun, 29 Jul 2007 16:45:23 +0200 Message-ID: <46ACA806.5030704@FreeBSD.org> Date: Sun, 29 Jul 2007 16:45:26 +0200 From: Remko Lodder User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.5 (Macintosh/20070716) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Thomas Dickey References: <20070729124116.GA4489@saltmine.radix.net> <20070729135024.GA473@saltmine.radix.net> <20070729144202.GA17101@saltmine.radix.net> In-Reply-To: <20070729144202.GA17101@saltmine.radix.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: current@freebsd.org, Rong-En Fan Subject: Re: TERM={xterm-r5,xterm-r6} behaving badly with man(1) X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 29 Jul 2007 16:00:06 -0000 Thomas Dickey wrote: > On Sun, Jul 29, 2007 at 10:22:52AM -0400, Daniel Eischen wrote: >> On Sun, 29 Jul 2007, Thomas Dickey wrote: >> >>> On Sun, Jul 29, 2007 at 09:10:26AM -0400, Daniel Eischen wrote: >>>> I have no idea what you are talking about (terminfo vs termcap). >>> file a bug report (the package maintainer is polite and knowledgable) >> A bug report to what? ncurses? termcap? I can certainly commit a >> fix to our /etc/termcap, but I've no idea where this should be >> properly done. > > The package maintainer should be able to see (start with ncurses) > I dont think the PR system is intended for jumping around, lets first see what the problem is and THEN file a PR. Currently we seem to be guessing around which is of no help for anyone. I included Rong-En in the mailing who is responsible for ncurses. Cheers, remko -- Kind regards, Remko Lodder ** remko@elvandar.org FreeBSD ** remko@FreeBSD.org /* Quis custodiet ipsos custodes */