From owner-freebsd-isp Sun Dec 14 11:49:20 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id LAA04274 for isp-outgoing; Sun, 14 Dec 1997 11:49:20 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-isp) Received: from sundial.sundial.net (root@sundial.sundial.net [204.181.150.2]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id LAA04265 for ; Sun, 14 Dec 1997 11:49:14 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from gme@sundial.net) Received: from caffeine (caffeine.inspace.net [207.204.40.248]) by sundial.sundial.net (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id OAA09004 for ; Sun, 14 Dec 1997 14:49:10 -0500 (EST) Message-Id: <3.0.5.32.19971214144719.009403c0@sundial.net> X-Sender: gme@sundial.net X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Pro Version 3.0.5 (32) Date: Sun, 14 Dec 1997 14:47:19 -0500 To: isp@freebsd.org From: "George M. Ellenburg" Subject: Subnetting, Firewalls, Class C's Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Sender: owner-freebsd-isp@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Suffering from a cold, and heavy medication, I wish to run the following by some of you to confirm or deny that this subnetting example will work; everything tells me yes, but I would appreciate a second opinion: ip ranges netmask 204.181.150.1 - 204.181.150.14 255.255.255.240 204.181.150.17 - 204.181.150.30 255.255.255.240 204.181.150.33 - 204.181.150.46 255.255.255.240 204.181.150.49 - 204.181.150.54 255.255.255.248 204.181.150.57 - 204.181.150.254 255.255.255.56 Regards, George -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: PGP for Personal Privacy 5.5 iQA/AwUBNJQ3xtorHPLZtoZoEQIHPgCgrWGBueRvuLjD4ikeHGRXoUchaw8AoI4r LferH+1wVhLJll0kf7s+zXHO =JxBp -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----