From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 1 23:19:41 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7BF511065670; Mon, 1 Sep 2008 23:19:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pb@ludd.ltu.se) Received: from mother.ludd.ltu.se (mother.ludd.ltu.se [130.240.16.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 028E68FC1B; Mon, 1 Sep 2008 23:19:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pb@ludd.ltu.se) Received: from brother.ludd.ltu.se (root@brother.ludd.ltu.se [130.240.16.78]) by mother.ludd.ltu.se (8.13.6+Sun/8.12.10) with ESMTP id m81NJcia010364; Tue, 2 Sep 2008 01:19:38 +0200 (MEST) Received: from brother.ludd.ltu.se (pb@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brother.ludd.ltu.se (8.13.6+Sun/8.12.2) with ESMTP id m81NJcN3006027; Tue, 2 Sep 2008 01:19:38 +0200 (MEST) Received: (from pb@localhost) by brother.ludd.ltu.se (8.13.6+Sun/8.13.6/Submit) id m81NJckk006025; Tue, 2 Sep 2008 01:19:38 +0200 (MEST) From: Peter B Message-Id: <200809012319.m81NJckk006025@brother.ludd.ltu.se> To: lme@FreeBSD.org Date: Tue, 2 Sep 2008 01:19:38 +0200 (MEST) In-Reply-To: <20080901220706.GB3961@e.0x20.net> from "Lars Engels" at Sep 02, 2008 12:07:06 AM X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL6] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailman-Approved-At: Tue, 02 Sep 2008 02:45:59 +0000 Cc: usb@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: USB Video class X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 01 Sep 2008 23:19:41 -0000 >> > >> >Is there any ongoing project towards USB Video class support in FreeBSD = >=2E.? >>=20 >> This is better asked on usb@ (CCed). I'm not aware of such an effort, fee= >l free to start it (you better wait some days until the=20 >> new USB stack hits CVS). >NetBSD had a Summer of Code project and it seems to be pretty >successful: >http://netbsd-soc.sourceforge.net/projects/uvc/ >Perhaps one can take this as a starting point? When testing. I found it seems to be easier to port the OpenBSD code. I think it's because it's more integrated into the kernel sources. The current status is proper probe, attach, and capability dump. I think I know how to approach the problem better now after messing with code for awhile. (however some other things are using my time atm)