From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Thu Oct 10 08:47:14 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4321514ED2B for ; Thu, 10 Oct 2019 08:47:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bapt@FreeBSD.org) Received: from smtp.freebsd.org (smtp.freebsd.org [96.47.72.83]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 46pl8212mdz4pZl; Thu, 10 Oct 2019 08:47:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bapt@FreeBSD.org) Received: from ivaldir.etoilebsd.net (etoilebsd.net [178.32.217.76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) (Authenticated sender: bapt) by smtp.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E2FF71CC65; Thu, 10 Oct 2019 08:47:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bapt@FreeBSD.org) Received: by ivaldir.etoilebsd.net (Postfix, from userid 1001) id DE683945E1; Thu, 10 Oct 2019 10:47:12 +0200 (CEST) Date: Thu, 10 Oct 2019 10:47:12 +0200 From: Baptiste Daroussin To: Peter Jeremy Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [HEADSUP] Re: Is IPV6 option still necessary? Message-ID: <20191010084712.grtcj2xgkgotzhea@ivaldir.net> References: <20191007.151841.1094708479149685365.yasu@utahime.org> <8spu-p72a-wny@FreeBSD.org> <20191009101412.lwxyqcdaqtsvq2ym@ivaldir.net> <20191009143048.zliwcrjx7ahe67a7@ivaldir.net> <20191010084455.GC24576@server.rulingia.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="326ivgdojpgwcfr2" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20191010084455.GC24576@server.rulingia.com> User-Agent: NeoMutt/20180716 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 10 Oct 2019 08:47:14 -0000 --326ivgdojpgwcfr2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, Oct 10, 2019 at 07:44:55PM +1100, Peter Jeremy wrote: > On 2019-Oct-09 16:30:48 +0200, Baptiste Daroussin wrot= e: > >so if we want to proceed further in removing the option to build with or= without > >ipv6 for the ports side. >=20 > Last time I checked, XDMCP differs enough between IPv4 and IPv6 that xdm > used a compile-time option to pick which to support. For cases like that we should have flavors, exactly like we have for bird f= or example. Best regards, Bapt --326ivgdojpgwcfr2 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCAAdFiEEgOTj3suS2urGXVU3Y4mL3PG3PloFAl2e8A0ACgkQY4mL3PG3 PlpHoA//SrGblg4j/aZvGVQfb7bVd3HejBXLzbBpW1aflWtcuMAQXdGKOMjhe1xy kmn+qYAzNX3uM+QEuYpAOP25a+N56nf/VKHgGzoljzFpTzcWT7F3plcBC/COqFL0 uKID7UDvGokLG486uPsYGBunOJn8iB3TQzOpXVtMuXIJDwl6pCDa6jmshpnLORxF 1h2QeUEWGP8OFXSbqzR5gWY/E78LHxb3LyyNA72FKyTltcaI0o1VVTPec5TpOgiM OBel6faMkyoJVQn5XjjO5dTVPWO0vcIgnM4o75HHzx/iqweuaTvrvRRQFez3Kn3M MmdhDf6M3HMb09pdDIDxqAJFIwh7FbBqkGpK5hdwCUrqrHUHeFu7cCeAZWVRIOgr bAn92/qPjhaQIIOBk7b8et/XihuI1IOOB6zblCl22TsP4wvV3nkUUFFFtDObdqRu x13oI6QJzYubEiMBojUTJ1RLI2sFAzvZ6aT1bgRewVAb9jWZaPSzmYwgU59xm2Q3 TImXSKEEjFplpMn3mqG8hxnsuDslqQLBTkxaP4e3QLOiEx7OGS9+wht8AsT5T7G/ vbQDSkEEYS9ungN0u+XCCuPpItjV7x49vLFX8HjWC/gvm+8tU9cT+ohuipHuo3Ah 5OGwcJ+GYP9UdBdkZNO2MEqV+duH4D6ul1KdafFqGwWZ91HxiJs= =6noh -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --326ivgdojpgwcfr2--