From owner-freebsd-advocacy Tue Jul 20 1:58:54 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org Received: from gwdu60.gwdg.de (gwdu60.gwdg.de [134.76.10.60]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B55414BE0 for ; Tue, 20 Jul 1999 01:58:33 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from kheuer@gwdu60.gwdg.de) Received: from localhost (kheuer@localhost) by gwdu60.gwdg.de (8.9.2/8.9.2) with ESMTP id KAA21484 for ; Tue, 20 Jul 1999 10:57:56 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from kheuer@gwdu60.gwdg.de) Date: Tue, 20 Jul 1999 10:57:55 +0200 (CEST) From: Konrad Heuer To: freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org Subject: FreeBSDCon '99 ??? Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=X-UNKNOWN Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Sender: owner-freebsd-advocacy@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Hi everyone! I'm a little bit disappointed about the organizers of FreeBSDCon '99. I sent two or three times a question about submitting a paper to info@freebsdcon.org or papers@freebsdcon.org without *any* response. Instead of having used sendmail, I could have moved my mail directly to /dev/null. It's absolutely my intention to detach my cutup from my personal experience. It's just my opinion that an event made to increase the publicity of FreeBSD should not lead to frustration in the user community. Maybe my experience is singular one. In that case, the reader should forget this mail or reply with a positive message. But if someone else has made a similar experience, we should discuss, and the organizers of FreeBSDCon '99 should think about. Regards // // Konrad Heuer ____ ___ _____= __=20 // Gesellschaft f=FCr wissenschaftliche / __/______ ___ / _ )/ __= / _ \ // Datenverarbeitung mbH G=D6ttingen / _// __/ -_) -_) _ |\ \/= // / // Am Fa=DFberg, D-37077 G=D6ttingen /_/ /_/ \__/\__/____/___= /____/=20 // Deutschland (Germany) ----- The Power to Serve ----= - // http://www.freebsd.org // kheuer@gwdu60.gwdg.de // To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-advocacy" in the body of the message