From owner-freebsd-questions Tue Oct 10 11:16:17 1995 Return-Path: owner-questions Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.6.12/8.6.6) id LAA28369 for questions-outgoing; Tue, 10 Oct 1995 11:16:17 -0700 Received: from phaeton.artisoft.com (phaeton.Artisoft.COM [198.17.250.211]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.6.12/8.6.6) with ESMTP id LAA28363 for ; Tue, 10 Oct 1995 11:16:06 -0700 Received: (from terry@localhost) by phaeton.artisoft.com (8.6.11/8.6.9) id LAA10683; Tue, 10 Oct 1995 11:09:21 -0700 From: Terry Lambert Message-Id: <199510101809.LAA10683@phaeton.artisoft.com> Subject: Re: Hard disk copying To: cracauer@wavehh.hanse.de Date: Tue, 10 Oct 1995 11:09:21 -0700 (MST) Cc: itemple@elysium.CLare.tased.EDU.AU, questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <9510101239.AA14874@wavehh.hanse.de> from "Martin Cracauer" at Oct 10, 95 01:39:16 pm X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Length: 537 Sender: owner-questions@freebsd.org Precedence: bulk > newfs /dev/target_partition > #mount it > cd /mount_of_new_filefilesystem > dump 0sf 400000 - /usr_or_whatever | restore rf - > > Of course, this is on per-partition, not per-disk base, but has the > advantage that it works for different-sized partitions. It also works while mounted. The previous suggestion would have left the copy of the drive in an inconsistant state if it were mounted. Terry Lambert terry@lambert.org --- Any opinions in this posting are my own and not those of my present or previous employers.