Date: Thu, 7 Jun 2012 17:57:31 -0400 From: Steve Wills <swills@FreeBSD.org> To: Mel Flynn <rflynn@acsalaska.net> Cc: "ports@freebsd.org" <ports@FreeBSD.org>, "ruby@freebsd.org" <ruby@FreeBSD.org> Subject: Re: Ruby 1.9 as default Message-ID: <2450B0F8-B82F-44D1-8397-C57D5A6F00CC@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <4FD0F9E3.1030501@acsalaska.net> References: <4FC96D45.8080904@FreeBSD.org> <4FD0F9E3.1030501@acsalaska.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Jun 7, 2012, at 2:58 PM, Mel Flynn <rflynn@acsalaska.net> wrote: > On 2-6-2012 3:32, Steve Wills wrote: >> Hi All, >>=20 >> I think we should try to make Ruby 1.9 the default Ruby again and would >> like to see it done before 9.1 is released. I've submitted a patch which >> does this and requested and exp-run from portmgr. >=20 > This may become obsolete soon, since graphics/gdal is going to be > updated, but with my current (slightly outdated) ports tree it fails > with not being able to find: > a) the ruby binary since there is no /usr/local/bin/ruby This is expected. Try setting RUBY_DEFAULT_VER instead. > b) as a side-effect ruby.h, but also because swig is using a deprecated > Config interface that apparently is unable to set the include path > correctly. >=20 Sounds like it just needs a s/Config/RbConfig/ which is a standard Ruby 1.9 c= omparability fix.=20 Steve > swig-1.3.40 > RUBY_VER=3D1.9 in /etc/make.conf > RUBY config option set in graphics/gdal >=20 > Given issues described with swig 1.x earlier on this list, you may want > to investigate if swig 1.x should be removed/patched/whatever before > this sweep. > --=20 > Mel > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?2450B0F8-B82F-44D1-8397-C57D5A6F00CC>