From owner-freebsd-questions Thu Feb 5 19:26:30 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id TAA09684 for questions-outgoing; Thu, 5 Feb 1998 19:26:30 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from gringo.cdrom.com (ppp-022.tky.exa.co.jp [210.129.93.22]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id TAA09615; Thu, 5 Feb 1998 19:26:17 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jkh@gringo.cdrom.com) Received: from gringo.cdrom.com (jkh@localhost.cdrom.com [127.0.0.1]) by gringo.cdrom.com (8.8.8/8.8.5) with ESMTP id TAA00558; Thu, 5 Feb 1998 19:24:00 -0800 (PST) To: dg@root.com cc: Rob Levandowski , "George Ellenburg" , jkh@FreeBSD.ORG, freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG, "Matt Stein" Subject: Re: Year 2000 compliance statement? In-reply-to: Your message of "Thu, 05 Feb 1998 15:55:08 PST." <199802052355.PAA02722@implode.root.com> Date: Thu, 05 Feb 1998 19:23:55 -0800 Message-ID: <554.886735435@gringo.cdrom.com> From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG X-To-Unsubscribe: mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org "unsubscribe questions" > The closest I can get to the statement you are asking for is "We believe, > but cannot guarantee, that FreeBSD is Y2K compliant. We've spent a significan t > amount of time verifying this to be the case, but it is possible that somethi ng > may have been overlooked. If a Y2K bug is found in the future, we will attemp t > to fix it as soon as possible". I think that sums it up fairly nicely, yes. Jordan