From owner-freebsd-current Tue Apr 4 10:34:23 1995 Return-Path: current-owner Received: (from majordom@localhost) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) id KAA15773 for current-outgoing; Tue, 4 Apr 1995 10:34:23 -0700 Received: from mail.barrnet.net (mail.BARRNET.NET [131.119.246.7]) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) with ESMTP id KAA15767 for ; Tue, 4 Apr 1995 10:34:21 -0700 Received: from dataplex.net (SHARK.DATAPLEX.NET [199.183.109.241]) by mail.barrnet.net (8.6.10/MAIL-RELAY-LEN) with ESMTP id KAA17124 for ; Tue, 4 Apr 1995 10:31:28 -0700 Received: from [199.183.109.242] by dataplex.net with SMTP (MailShare 1.0b8); Tue, 4 Apr 1995 12:33:54 -0500 X-Sender: wacky@shark.dataplex.net Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Date: Tue, 4 Apr 1995 12:33:58 -0500 To: nate@sneezy.sri.com (Nate Williams) From: rkw@dataplex.net (Richard Wackerbarth) Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/i386/conf Makefile.i386 Cc: current@FreeBSD.org Sender: current-owner@FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk >But, *IF* both the src dist and /usr/include directories exist, the >include files are pulled out of /usr/src/include if they exist and >/usr/include next. (Which should never happen since /usr/src/include >should always contain all of the necessary include files which aren't in >the /usr/src/sys tree) I think that this is bogus behavior. If a file is missing from /usr/src/include, I don't want it to be "magically" found. Under your scheme, I will never be able to test a distribution tree for completeness on my production system. Further, a user who does not have the entire source distribution could "create" the includes by either copying or linking in /usr/include. Therefore, I think that your change MUST be retracted. ---- Richard Wackerbarth rkw@dataplex.net