From owner-freebsd-net Thu Feb 7 13:29: 3 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from tomts6-srv.bellnexxia.net (tomts6.bellnexxia.net [209.226.175.26]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 29EBC37B400 for ; Thu, 7 Feb 2002 13:28:54 -0800 (PST) Received: from xena.gsicomp.on.ca ([199.243.128.21]) by tomts6-srv.bellnexxia.net (InterMail vM.4.01.03.16 201-229-121-116-20010115) with ESMTP id <20020207212853.TDD27465.tomts6-srv.bellnexxia.net@xena.gsicomp.on.ca>; Thu, 7 Feb 2002 16:28:53 -0500 Received: from hermes (hermes.gsicomp.on.ca [192.168.0.18]) by xena.gsicomp.on.ca (8.11.1/8.11.1) with SMTP id g17LHMi43567; Thu, 7 Feb 2002 16:17:22 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from matt@gsicomp.on.ca) Message-ID: <004701c1b01e$7039d3f0$361c1a09@gsicomp.on.ca> From: "Matthew Emmerton" To: "Tariq Rashid" , References: Subject: Re: squeeze more performance out of natd? Date: Thu, 7 Feb 2002 16:28:50 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4807.1700 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4807.1700 Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org > i've spent a good number of hours RTFMs, trying to make the best of a bad > situtaion: userland natd instead of kernel-space nat. I've been told that if you use ipf and ipnat, then you get the benefit of kernel-space NAT. Have you investigated this to see how it compares to natd/ipfw for your purposes? -- Matt Emmerton To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message