From owner-freebsd-stable Mon May 24 23: 0: 9 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from zippy.cdrom.com (zippy.cdrom.com [204.216.27.228]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1501214D74 for ; Mon, 24 May 1999 23:00:06 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from jkh@zippy.cdrom.com) Received: from zippy.cdrom.com (jkh@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by zippy.cdrom.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id XAA03134; Mon, 24 May 1999 23:00:57 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from jkh@zippy.cdrom.com) To: Sergey Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: [Q] How stable is FreeBSD 3.X ? In-reply-to: Your message of "25 May 1999 05:37:06 -0000." <19990525053706.15157.qmail@nym.alias.net> Date: Mon, 24 May 1999 23:00:57 -0700 Message-ID: <3130.927612057@zippy.cdrom.com> From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > I've checked this out on good hardware. And now can CLAIM that > 3.1-R *really* have kernel problems on FreeBSD's "classic" configuration. This message is content free. Where are the details? Whining is not what we need to see here since it is useless for everyone concerned to even read it. Technical data which supports the existence of a kernel bug which we can then work to find and fix, that is not useless and quite helpful to everyone here, including other users who might *also* wish to know a few concrete details about the problems you're having. - Jordan To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message