Date: Sat, 12 Dec 2020 01:58:01 +0100 From: Jan Beich <jbeich@FreeBSD.org> To: Tatsuki Makino <tatsuki_makino@hotmail.com> Cc: Kevin Oberman <rkoberman@gmail.com>, Greg Rivers <gcr+freebsd-ports@tharned.org>, FreeBSD Ports <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Stale pkg repo? Message-ID: <h7or-lu1y-wny@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <TY2PR02MB4013E3721C94588461036753FACA0@TY2PR02MB4013.apcprd02.prod.outlook.com> (Tatsuki Makino's message of "Sat, 12 Dec 2020 06:53:42 %2B0900") References: <2081315.3V7qYkmoPJ@no.place.like.home> <CAN6yY1tXx0LJMnYG7-2RZK4ddu0jQE8tp52S9yVN42qoT1xvBQ@mail.gmail.com> <TY2PR02MB4013E3721C94588461036753FACA0@TY2PR02MB4013.apcprd02.prod.outlook.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Tatsuki Makino <tatsuki_makino@hotmail.com> writes: > It seems that just 1 package update ( gtk3? :) ) can cause the > official poudriere to build a daunting amount of work. Pales in comparison to FreeBSD security advisiories which force rebuild of all 33000 packages. Given package builds are not reproducibile yet[1] rsync maybe wasting bandwidth on large packages. [1] https://reviews.freebsd.org/D24586
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?h7or-lu1y-wny>