Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 12 Dec 2020 01:58:01 +0100
From:      Jan Beich <jbeich@FreeBSD.org>
To:        Tatsuki Makino <tatsuki_makino@hotmail.com>
Cc:        Kevin Oberman <rkoberman@gmail.com>, Greg Rivers <gcr+freebsd-ports@tharned.org>, FreeBSD Ports <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: Stale pkg repo?
Message-ID:  <h7or-lu1y-wny@FreeBSD.org>
In-Reply-To: <TY2PR02MB4013E3721C94588461036753FACA0@TY2PR02MB4013.apcprd02.prod.outlook.com> (Tatsuki Makino's message of "Sat, 12 Dec 2020 06:53:42 %2B0900")
References:  <2081315.3V7qYkmoPJ@no.place.like.home> <CAN6yY1tXx0LJMnYG7-2RZK4ddu0jQE8tp52S9yVN42qoT1xvBQ@mail.gmail.com> <TY2PR02MB4013E3721C94588461036753FACA0@TY2PR02MB4013.apcprd02.prod.outlook.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Tatsuki Makino <tatsuki_makino@hotmail.com> writes:

> It seems that just 1 package update ( gtk3? :) ) can cause the
> official poudriere to build a daunting amount of work.

Pales in comparison to FreeBSD security advisiories which force rebuild
of all 33000 packages. Given package builds are not reproducibile yet[1]
rsync maybe wasting bandwidth on large packages.

[1] https://reviews.freebsd.org/D24586



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?h7or-lu1y-wny>