From owner-freebsd-hardware@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 19 16:24:47 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D5D0816A401 for ; Mon, 19 Feb 2007 16:24:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists@hausro.de) Received: from mail3.netbeat.de (mail3.netbeat.de [83.243.58.162]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 3A94513C4A6 for ; Mon, 19 Feb 2007 16:24:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists@hausro.de) Received: (qmail 5476 invoked by uid 89); 19 Feb 2007 15:58:45 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO Rage) (86.104.203.150) by mail3.netbeat.de with SMTP; 19 Feb 2007 15:58:45 -0000 Message-ID: <00b401c7543e$be6f4fe0$847ba8c0@Rage> From: "ANdrei" To: "satimis" References: <9021341.post@talk.nabble.com><200702190804.l1J84ngm012593@lurza.secnetix.de> <9041989.post@talk.nabble.com> Date: Mon, 19 Feb 2007 17:58:05 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; reply-type=original Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.3028 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.3028 Cc: freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org Subject: Re: About ideal RAM capacity X-BeenThere: freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: General discussion of FreeBSD hardware List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 19 Feb 2007 16:24:47 -0000 In a company I provide solutions for, for an office with 10 PC's in the network I successfully use a Pentium-120 with 16MB of RAM for the last 5-6 years without any interruption :) And those people do web-based applications, doing quite a lot of up/downloads and alike. This server is router/packet filter/DNS and runs about 0.10-0.15 load all the time... But that be said, it doesn't have many DNS requests, as well as little disk activity on the server itself due to other jobs than routing/NAT/firewall. And as it runs well, the owner doesn't want to change it, though anything you can find for free on the streets would already be an upgrade to this computer :) So, as mentioned, amount of RAM depends on what you want to do. But FreeBSD is a wonderchild here in my opinion, so you might well need less than you expect, if you're not yet very familiar with FreeBSD. good luck, ANdrei http://students.oamk.fi/~t6ruan00/ ------ Never argue with an idiot. They drag you down to their level then beat you with experience... ----- Original Message ----- From: "satimis" To: Sent: Monday, February 19, 2007 3:09 PM Subject: Re: About ideal RAM capacity > > > Oliver Fromme wrote: >> >> satimis wrote: >> > I'm prepared to run FreeBSD-6.2 amd64 on an AMD Athlon64 x2 (dualcore) >> > 512Kx2 3800 box as server. What will be an ideal RAM capacity to be >> > installed. TIA >> >> It depends entirely on what you are planning to run on that >> machine. The kind of CPU is pretty much irrelevant. >> >> For example, if you're planning to run it as DNS server, >> router and/or packet filter, then about 128 to 256 MB will >> probably suffice. ;-) >> > Noted with tks. > > B.R. > satimis > > -- > View this message in context: > http://www.nabble.com/About-ideal-RAM-capacity-tf3245275.html#a9041989 > Sent from the freebsd-hardware mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hardware > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-hardware-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >