From owner-freebsd-java Sat Jun 10 14:59:29 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-java@freebsd.org Received: from ns.yogotech.com (ns.yogotech.com [206.127.123.66]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B3CD937B817 for ; Sat, 10 Jun 2000 14:59:20 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from nate@yogotech.com) Received: from nomad.yogotech.com (nomad.yogotech.com [206.127.123.131]) by ns.yogotech.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id PAA08551; Sat, 10 Jun 2000 15:59:09 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from nate@nomad.yogotech.com) Received: (from nate@localhost) by nomad.yogotech.com (8.8.8/8.8.8) id OAA03379; Sat, 10 Jun 2000 14:59:08 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from nate) Date: Sat, 10 Jun 2000 14:59:08 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <200006102159.OAA03379@nomad.yogotech.com> From: Nate Williams MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Thomas Runge Cc: freebsd-java@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: native 1.2.2 In-Reply-To: <3940CFA1.3372CED0@rostock.zgdv.de> References: <3940CFA1.3372CED0@rostock.zgdv.de> X-Mailer: VM 6.34 under 19.16 "Lille" XEmacs Lucid Reply-To: nate@yogotech.com (Nate Williams) Sender: owner-freebsd-java@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org > But one thing makes me thoughtfully. It seems, that our native > port without JIT is faster then the linux port with JIT, at > least within Swing based applications. > How can that be? That is actually normal. We've found that the JIT tends to be heavy GUI applications slower than w/out a JIT, due to the increase in size for the JIT'd code and larger runtime issues, which blow the cache. Nate To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-java" in the body of the message