Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2012 13:46:08 -0500 From: Ed Maste <emaste@freebsd.org> To: Garrett Cooper <yanegomi@gmail.com> Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Parallels v4 regression (aka ada(4) oddity) in RELENG_9 Message-ID: <20120123184604.GA5939@sandvine.com> In-Reply-To: <CAGH67wSEbWkLg_kPPhx3x6KKXrr7LZKdTD7CPp2WP4XGpPpLBg@mail.gmail.com> References: <009501ccd9f9$cad088d0$60719a70$@fisglobal.com> <CAGH67wRhT30j2Ask-9pQOQcTihFD5AsOdGXbwPTW6DbPrGc4zw@mail.gmail.com> <1327343079.69022.87.camel@revolution.hippie.lan> <CAGH67wSEbWkLg_kPPhx3x6KKXrr7LZKdTD7CPp2WP4XGpPpLBg@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, Jan 23, 2012 at 10:32:59AM -0800, Garrett Cooper wrote: > It's better to be methodical and delete all of the partitions and > create the table from scratch. I've run into reproducible cases in the > past where just doing gpart destroy -F for instance [on 9.0-BETA1+ > media] didn't work because geom retasted the partition tables and > slices. Do you have the reproduction steps documented somewhere (and if not, can you write them up)? In order to have working automated installs we need to be able to unconditionally reinit a drive w/o having behavoiur depend on what happens to be left behind. -Ed
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20120123184604.GA5939>