From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 16 16:56:21 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6571D16A4CE for ; Tue, 16 Nov 2004 16:56:21 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtp1.utdallas.edu (smtp1.utdallas.edu [129.110.10.12]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4781343D48 for ; Tue, 16 Nov 2004 16:56:21 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from pauls@utdallas.edu) Received: from utd49554 (utd49554.utdallas.edu [129.110.3.85]) by smtp1.utdallas.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id CAF04388C3B; Tue, 16 Nov 2004 10:56:20 -0600 (CST) Date: Tue, 16 Nov 2004 10:56:34 -0600 From: Paul Schmehl To: "Conrad J. Sabatier" , "Michael C. Shultz" Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <20041115184642.337300c8@dolphin.local.net> References: <200411151324.09969.ringworm@inbox.lv> <20041115184642.337300c8@dolphin.local.net> X-Mailer: Mulberry/3.1.6 (Linux/x86) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Finding options for ports X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: Paul Schmehl List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 16 Nov 2004 16:56:21 -0000 --On Monday, November 15, 2004 06:46:42 PM -0600 "Conrad J. Sabatier" wrote: > > This is a useless use of "cat". You could accomplish the same thing > with: > > grep WITH Makefile When there are ten different ways to skin a cat, what makes one way inherently better than another? Paul Schmehl (pauls@utdallas.edu) Adjunct Information Security Officer The University of Texas at Dallas AVIEN Founding Member http://www.utdallas.edu