From owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Sat May 1 19:13:04 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 87C30106568A for ; Sat, 1 May 2010 19:13:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from alexander@leidinger.net) Received: from mail.ebusiness-leidinger.de (mail.ebusiness-leidinger.de [217.11.53.44]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 444858FC1D for ; Sat, 1 May 2010 19:13:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: from outgoing.leidinger.net (pD9E2CFDC.dip.t-dialin.net [217.226.207.220]) by mail.ebusiness-leidinger.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id ED045844165; Sat, 1 May 2010 21:12:54 +0200 (CEST) Received: from unknown (unknown [192.168.2.110]) by outgoing.leidinger.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id D58F950BE; Sat, 1 May 2010 21:12:50 +0200 (CEST) Date: Sat, 1 May 2010 21:12:50 +0200 From: Alexander Leidinger To: Ed Schouten Message-ID: <20100501211250.00007a1c@unknown> In-Reply-To: <20100501124544.GR56080@hoeg.nl> References: <20100501124544.GR56080@hoeg.nl> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.2cvs15 (GTK+ 2.16.0; i586-pc-mingw32msvc) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-EBL-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-EBL-MailScanner-ID: ED045844165.B2166 X-EBL-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-EBL-MailScanner-SpamCheck: not spam, spamhaus-ZEN, SpamAssassin (not cached, score=-1.363, required 6, autolearn=disabled, ALL_TRUSTED -1.44, TW_WT 0.08) X-EBL-MailScanner-From: alexander@leidinger.net X-EBL-MailScanner-Watermark: 1273345976.16183@GF7/5SJ3rqpnD2dTnpUnnA X-EBL-Spam-Status: No Cc: freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: [Extension] utmpx and LOGIN_FAILURE X-BeenThere: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion related to FreeBSD architecture List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 01 May 2010 19:13:04 -0000 On Sat, 1 May 2010 14:45:44 +0200 Ed Schouten wrote: > Hi all, > > Some time ago I noticed some operating systems offer an interface > called btmp, which is essentially a wtmp for logging failed login > attempts. Instead of taking the same approach, I'd rather do Does this default to on or off or is this always on? If the later: some kind of a switch (no matter what the default is) would be highly desired. Bye, Alexander.