From owner-freebsd-alpha Tue Dec 10 13:18:20 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-alpha@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E7D5937B401; Tue, 10 Dec 2002 13:18:18 -0800 (PST) Received: from duke.cs.duke.edu (duke.cs.duke.edu [152.3.140.1]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B59343EC5; Tue, 10 Dec 2002 13:18:18 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from gallatin@cs.duke.edu) Received: from grasshopper.cs.duke.edu (grasshopper.cs.duke.edu [152.3.145.30]) by duke.cs.duke.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id QAA16296; Tue, 10 Dec 2002 16:18:17 -0500 (EST) Received: (from gallatin@localhost) by grasshopper.cs.duke.edu (8.11.6/8.9.1) id gBALHl104682; Tue, 10 Dec 2002 16:17:47 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from gallatin@cs.duke.edu) From: Andrew Gallatin MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <15862.23035.670672.895@grasshopper.cs.duke.edu> Date: Tue, 10 Dec 2002 16:17:47 -0500 (EST) To: Robert Watson Cc: alpha@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: cvs commit: www/en/projects/busdma index.sgml style.css (fwd) In-Reply-To: References: <15862.22081.436375.524026@grasshopper.cs.duke.edu> X-Mailer: VM 6.75 under 21.1 (patch 12) "Channel Islands" XEmacs Lucid Sender: owner-freebsd-alpha@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Robert Watson writes: > > As I said before, some (all?) scsi drivers use it. Isa devices which > > work on alpha use it. It works for the older raw bus_dmamap_load. Its > > the mbuf interface which is untested. > > Sorry, I should have been more specific -- that's what I meant. Do you > know if the _uio loading interface works? No, I think that Sam added this at the same time as the mbuf interface, so its untested as well. > > > improvement to better support large memory systems. Do you mind if I set > > > you as the task owner on the busdma page for making sure alpha busdma is > > > up to spec? I'd like to make sure all this stuff is in line for 5.1, if > > > we can. > > > > Depends what you mean by "up to spec". If you mean making sure the mbuf > > interface works, then yes. If you mean making large memory machine work > > well, then no. > > "up to spec" in the sense that network interface drivers will continue to > work as they are converted. > Then yes. Drew To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-alpha" in the body of the message