From owner-freebsd-java Tue Feb 25 10:20:17 2003 Delivered-To: freebsd-java@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B1FD337B401 for ; Tue, 25 Feb 2003 10:20:16 -0800 (PST) Received: from misery.sdf.com (misery.sdf.com [207.200.153.226]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2CF2F43F3F for ; Tue, 25 Feb 2003 10:20:15 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from tom@sdf.com) Received: from tom (helo=localhost) by misery.sdf.com with local-esmtp (Exim 2.12 #1) id 18niYw-000785-00; Tue, 25 Feb 2003 09:08:14 -0800 Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2003 09:08:11 -0800 (PST) From: Tom Samplonius To: Jan Grant Cc: freebsd-java@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Problem building native 1.4.1 with ALT_BOOTDIR as linux-sun-jdk1.4.1_01-b01 on Feb 4 stable In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-java@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Tue, 25 Feb 2003, Jan Grant wrote: > I'm still seeing this issue when trying to build the 1.4.1 native java > bootstrapping with the linux-sun jdk (the previous native version of > 1.4.1 is incapable of bootstrapping the latest version, bombing out at > the javac stage) ... A general question: do you actually need to bootstrap 1.4.1 with another 1.4.1 jdk? I was under the impression that any 1.3.x jdk could bootstrap the 1.4.1 source? Tom To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-java" in the body of the message