From owner-svn-src-stable@freebsd.org Thu Mar 29 02:17:52 2018 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-src-stable@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 636DBF66087 for ; Thu, 29 Mar 2018 02:17:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists@eitanadler.com) Received: from mail-yb0-x236.google.com (mail-yb0-x236.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4002:c09::236]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E829F7154E for ; Thu, 29 Mar 2018 02:17:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists@eitanadler.com) Received: by mail-yb0-x236.google.com with SMTP id d7-v6so1272057ybn.9 for ; Wed, 28 Mar 2018 19:17:51 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=eitanadler.com; s=0xdeadbeef; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id :subject:to:cc; bh=fGwpcEHZEBlQLJKAEuozAlXmNw5/bv9yNtd0n7OHjOk=; b=mcbaPS2atX/yWro5WXbIREPiJ4nlPAd3ZitVL02nTD/4O/184rDXFaFzmSncRKHy5o zhX0ju3LBlFhAuSvuK1h5si41Lj1boGVF11jrA5B5oT3wA7FfVqDOBzavCwhGRvERDZ5 ewrWkGfFUHNdjNEb9g1WffslL7qqthwso+yqc= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from :date:message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=fGwpcEHZEBlQLJKAEuozAlXmNw5/bv9yNtd0n7OHjOk=; b=NlHt7Hx/OTt5mZ56TTeyv5fpljQrGp7G5LLCsBiSaoNokVBIKpyvFvvexEu8fPqCpe /YY8ERX8xcWSKeR0RnBUOGupKX/y8skMfvSYnDzei1nLlwaaluAX03sGCRd1622/aUbu 7DoKxh8Mn8FS+tvWH9RHbQiOENu/U0VP1VtWgBeZLe34KH5betr3fUlmk3G+VciSYHP8 PahHuvS8HljTJqElg/AbXCtfTpkzH7KPjo0DXhv+WcIQXMN/vLrJXuZdHdqF0ldzQWvg VqwF4sNWOTRSZnF503wNoqayzdIpmvQRM6yOE/QBLxIZuDK4cwbWns3UN8kdVBfi6xVz kLEg== X-Gm-Message-State: ALQs6tBJ7chzItteIzVXmXsh2IstpNoONiZB6JvbXcq597C7lAq3bSZY EOEhMUqNo3AVUorHPzgDl5apqyI3PLB3Sw+GzakKsw== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AIpwx48/GBgVB5Tb0/POhtOCrGIJE9oh4kOf1rQ1pDk7PPJj5dQq8pR3F/cM2CKI7EbzQA5M+RsH8e2w9RGL8jvihBc= X-Received: by 2002:a25:2ccf:: with SMTP id s198-v6mr3772603ybs.194.1522289871222; Wed, 28 Mar 2018 19:17:51 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: lists@eitanadler.com Received: by 2002:a5b:990:0:0:0:0:0 with HTTP; Wed, 28 Mar 2018 19:17:20 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <201803290204.w2T24foA060205@pdx.rh.CN85.dnsmgr.net> References: <201803290204.w2T24foA060205@pdx.rh.CN85.dnsmgr.net> From: Eitan Adler Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2018 19:17:20 -0700 X-Google-Sender-Auth: P5aEavTVdmvO0MmGJ4MDqwwuM0I Message-ID: Subject: Re: Mismerge at r330897 in stable/11, Audit report To: rgrimes@freebsd.org Cc: src-committers , svn-src-all@freebsd.org, svn-src-stable@freebsd.org, svn-src-stable-11@freebsd.org, FreeBSD Release Engineering Team Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-BeenThere: svn-src-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.25 Precedence: list List-Id: SVN commit messages for all the -stable branches of the src tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2018 02:17:52 -0000 On 28 March 2018 at 19:04, Rodney W. Grimes wrote: >> On 28 March 2018 at 18:35, Rodney W. Grimes >> wrote: >> >> >> Hi! >> >> >> >> >> >> This part of the MFC is wrong: >> >> >> >> >> >> https://svnweb.freebsd.org/base/stable/11/sys/sys/random.h?limit_changes=0&r1=330897&r2=330896&pathrev=330897 >> > >> > Can we try to identify exactly what rXXXXXX that is a merge of? >> > >> >> >> Could you please MFC back the other random related changes too? Some >> >> >> of them made by cem@. >> >> >> >> >> >> On 3/14/18, Eitan Adler wrote: >> >> >>> Author: eadler >> >> >>> Date: Wed Mar 14 03:19:51 2018 >> >> >>> New Revision: 330897 >> >> >>> URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/330897 >> >> >>> >> >> >>> Log: >> >> >>> Partial merge of the SPDX changes >> >> >>> >> >> >>> These changes are incomplete but are making it difficult >> >> >>> to determine what other changes can/should be merged. >> >> >>> >> >> >>> No objections from: pfg >> >> >>> >> >> > Am I missing something? If this MFC was supposed to be of the SPDX >> >> > license tagging, why does it have any functional changes? >> >> > >> >> > Especially changes to random(4)? >> >> >> >> This was my failure. I only spot checked & compile-checked the diff >> >> since I expected all changes to be comments/SPDX. >> >> >> >> However, I must have gotten carried away and included a few too many >> >> revisions. Unfortunately some people have already merged fixes to my >> >> failure and thus this can't be reverted as is without also reverting >> >> those fixes. >> >> >> >> That said, I should do that since this commit message is utterly wrong. >> > >> > We do not have to revert r330897, with what follows I think >> > we can easily find the revisions to revert from stable/11. >> > ... >> >> While we don't have to revert it I'd rather do so than have bogus history. > > Reverting wont remove that history, thats a one way deal, > and I think if we revert the bogus merges with the wrong > history thats as good as its gona get. > >> >> >From a look it seems the following was also merged: >> r316370, r317095, r324394, and a few others. >> >> Is there a reason you don't want me to revert the changes? > > Repository churn is my main concern. > > It touches 6000+ files some of which have probably > been touched since. A very carefull pre commit > audit would need to be done. > > Then another commit to 6000+ files to put it back, > also needing a pre-commit audit. (Pretty easy now > that I have a filter.) I'm actually using the same filter you pasted above to verify that my changes are only reverting said files. That said, while I'd prefer to revert, I'll defer to others if they have a differing opinion. Note that I won't have access my dev box after tomorrow for about a week. -- Eitan Adler Source, Ports, Doc committer Bugmeister, Ports Security teams