From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 15 16:00:32 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA4EE16A4CF for ; Wed, 15 Sep 2004 16:00:32 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smart.eusc.inter.net (smart.eusc.inter.net [213.73.101.5]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A6BD43D45 for ; Wed, 15 Sep 2004 16:00:32 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from msch@snafu.de) Received: from dial-76-243.de.inter.net ([213.73.76.243] helo=current.best-eng.de) by smart.eusc.inter.net with esmtp (Exim 3.36 #4) id 1C7cCs-00006N-00; Wed, 15 Sep 2004 18:00:31 +0200 Received: from current.best-eng.de (localhost.best-eng.de [127.0.0.1]) by current.best-eng.de (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id i8FG0UsA040555; Wed, 15 Sep 2004 18:00:30 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from msch@snafu.de) Received: by current.best-eng.de (8.13.1/8.13.1/Submit) id i8FG0TcE040389; Wed, 15 Sep 2004 18:00:29 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from msch@snafu.de) X-Authentication-Warning: current.best-eng.de: matthias set sender to msch@snafu.de using -f From: Matthias Schuendehuette Organization: Micro$oft-free Zone To: Nate Lawson Date: Wed, 15 Sep 2004 18:00:28 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.7 References: <200408141854.38477.msch@snafu.de> <200409121046.02724.msch@snafu.de> <414620DB.9070509@root.org> In-Reply-To: <414620DB.9070509@root.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200409151800.29001.msch@snafu.de> X-Mailman-Approved-At: Thu, 16 Sep 2004 12:04:37 +0000 cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ISDN4BSD broken... X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: msch@snafu.de List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 15 Sep 2004 16:00:33 -0000 Hello Nate, thank you for your reply! On Tuesday 14 September 2004 00:36, you wrote: > It's probably IRQ routing related. Try changing the check in > acpi_pci_link_is_valid_irq() to this: > > if (link->interrupts[i] == irq || AcpiGbl_FADT->SciInt == irq) I did this, but nothing changed. After that I double-checked 'dmesg' and found no second device, which shares the IRQ 10 of the ISA-Card (as it should be). So it's definitely ACPI related but probably *not* IRQ-Routing related - as far as I understand what IRQ-Routing should do... (distribute the various PCI-Devices to the few free IRQ-Lines). Is there anything else I should/could do? -- Ciao/BSD - Matthias Matthias Schuendehuette , Berlin (Germany) PGP-Key at and ID: 0xDDFB0A5F