Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2001 10:23:49 -0600 From: Warner Losh <imp@harmony.village.org> To: Ruslan Ermilov <ru@FreeBSD.org> Cc: Bruce Evans <bde@FreeBSD.org>, cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/share/man/man9 style.9 Message-ID: <200107201623.f6KGNno66864@harmony.village.org> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Fri, 20 Jul 2001 11:33:10 %2B0300." <20010720113310.C30828@sunbay.com> References: <20010720113310.C30828@sunbay.com> <200107191803.f6JI3he58920@freefall.freebsd.org> <20010719152744.A37403@sneakerz.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message <20010720113310.C30828@sunbay.com> Ruslan Ermilov writes:
: This is using style(9)'s second-level of four indents rule.
: But, strictly speaking, `else if' is not an operator, this
: is `else' operator followed by the `if' operator. So if we
: would use the second-level indent of four spaces relatively
: to the `if' operator, we would get:
:
: if (mylevel == SLC_DEFAULT) {
: slctab[(int)func].current.flag = flag;
: slctab[(int)func].current.val = val;
: flag |= SLC_ACK;
: } else if (hislevel == SLC_CANTCHANGE &&
: mylevel == SLC_CANTCHANGE) {
: flag &= ~SLC_LEVELBITS;
: flag |= SLC_NOSUPPORT;
: slctab[(int)func].current.flag = flag;
: }
:
: Which is much better, no? Hell, but then, I guess, we would need
: to indent lines within `else if' block relative to `if' as well.
I don't think it is better. If nothing else, emacs will have a harder
time doing that because you are indenting 4 spaces most of the time,
and 11 in this case. :-(
Warner
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200107201623.f6KGNno66864>