From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Nov 16 15:55:51 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 10F7316A418; Fri, 16 Nov 2007 15:55:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from zec@icir.org) Received: from zec2.tel.fer.hr (zec2.tel.fer.hr [161.53.19.79]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 858E613C468; Fri, 16 Nov 2007 15:55:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from zec@icir.org) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by zec2.tel.fer.hr (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id lAGGtTc8011428; Fri, 16 Nov 2007 16:55:29 GMT (envelope-from zec@icir.org) From: Marko Zec To: Robert Watson Date: Fri, 16 Nov 2007 16:55:28 +0000 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.7 References: <4732110D.3090808@interactive-net.de> <200711072245.05430.zec@icir.org> <20071116145807.G10677@fledge.watson.org> In-Reply-To: <20071116145807.G10677@fledge.watson.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200711161655.29348.zec@icir.org> Cc: bms@freebsd.org, freebsd-current@freebsd.org, Reinhard Haller Subject: Re: 7.0-BETA2 routed and multicast registration X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 16 Nov 2007 15:55:51 -0000 On Friday 16 November 2007 14:58:43 Robert Watson wrote: > On Wed, 7 Nov 2007, Marko Zec wrote: > > On Wednesday 07 November 2007 19:25:01 Reinhard Haller wrote: > >> routed has problems with setsockopt registering itself for > >> multicast. The trace contains the following messages: > >> > >> IP_ADD_MEMBERSHIP ALLROUTERS: Can't assign requested address turn > >> on RIP setsockopt(IP_ADD_MEMBERSHIP RIP): Can't assign requested > >> address setsockopt(rdisc_sock,IP_MULTICAST_IF): Can't assign > >> requested address > >> > >> Any suggestions? > > > > Perhaps the attached kernel patch could help? > > Dear all-- > > Just catching up on back e-mail, and found this. Did this patch go > anywhere (CVS HEAD, with an MFC, for example)? No it didn't. The patch restores support for interpreting 0.0.0.0/8 addresses as interface indexes, which was removed 5 months ago when in_mcast.c was originally introduced. bms@ posted the patch for review before commiting it, but I can't recall a wider discussion taking place about that change. Cheers, Marko