From owner-freebsd-current Thu Jul 3 04:17:03 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id EAA04202 for current-outgoing; Thu, 3 Jul 1997 04:17:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nagual.pp.ru (ache.relcom.ru [194.58.229.133]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id EAA04189 for ; Thu, 3 Jul 1997 04:16:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from ache@localhost) by nagual.pp.ru (8.8.6/8.8.5) id PAA00598; Thu, 3 Jul 1997 15:15:57 +0400 (MSD) Date: Thu, 3 Jul 1997 15:15:55 +0400 (MSD) From: =?KOI8-R?B?4c7E0sXKIP7F0s7P1w==?= To: Nate Williams cc: FreeBSD-current , Brian Somers , Chuck Robey , Joerg Wunsch Subject: Re: ppp & HUP. In-Reply-To: <199707030442.WAA29209@rocky.mt.sri.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-current@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk On Wed, 2 Jul 1997, Nate Williams wrote: > > If nobody will explain why this HUP is neded (hanging shells perfectly > > killed by SIGKILL), I'll remove HUP sending from init. > > Because it gives processes a chance to die 'nicely', instead of having > the run pulled out from under them. SIGTERM exist for this reason, not SIGHUP. -- Andrey A. Chernov http://www.nagual.pp.ru/~ache/