Date: Tue, 13 May 2003 13:10:10 -0700 (PDT) From: "=?iso-8859-1?q?Pedro=20F.=20Giffuni?=" <giffunip@yahoo.com> To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: ports/52019: enhancement to math/spooles Message-ID: <200305132010.h4DKAAm4033099@freefall.freebsd.org>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
The following reply was made to PR ports/52019; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: "=?iso-8859-1?q?Pedro=20F.=20Giffuni?=" <giffunip@yahoo.com>
To: Nakata Maho <chat95@mbox.kyoto-inet.or.jp>
Cc: FreeBSD-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org, maho@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: ports/52019: enhancement to math/spooles
Date: Tue, 13 May 2003 21:04:23 +0100 (BST)
--- Nakata Maho <chat95@mbox.kyoto-inet.or.jp> wrote: > Hi,
Pedro,
>
> However, I have two questions.
>
> a. MPI is still *not* thread safe, so your choice is good.
> b. which is better to link, -pthread (posix thread) or -lc_r
> (userland thread)
>
> I ask some other people.
>
Fortunately for us, the port doesn't link any threading
libraries. 5.0 doesn't like -pthread only -lc_r. Threads is an
area that is changing daily especially with KSE comming, in
fact, there is a threads mailing list.
The ports tree has ${PTHREADS_CFLAGS} $(PTHREAD_LIBS} variables,
so when possible I left that decision to the makefiles in my
ports.
cheers,
Pedro.
__________________________________________________
Yahoo! Plus
For a better Internet experience
http://www.yahoo.co.uk/btoffer
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200305132010.h4DKAAm4033099>