From owner-freebsd-hackers Mon Mar 15 0:19: 3 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from ns1.portal2.com (ns1.portal2.com [203.85.226.193]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C519C15379 for ; Mon, 15 Mar 1999 00:18:53 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from yusufg@huge.net) Received: (qmail 6998 invoked from network); 15 Mar 1999 08:33:21 -0000 Received: from yusufg.portal2.com (203.85.226.249) by ns1.portal2.com with SMTP; 15 Mar 1999 08:33:21 -0000 Received: (qmail 1036 invoked by uid 500); 15 Mar 1999 08:27:04 -0000 Date: 15 Mar 1999 08:27:04 -0000 Message-ID: <19990315082704.1035.qmail@yusufg.portal2.com> From: Yusuf Goolamabbas To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Cc: reiser@ricochet.net, sct@redhat.com Subject: Has anybody used Postmark for file system benchmark Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Postmark is available at http://www.netapp.com/technology/level3/3022.html I am currently trying it out on various FreeBSD 3.1-STABLE boxes (It compiled cleanly). Thought I would check with others if they had any experience with this. According to the paper , UFS on Solaris 2.5 sucks so I am seeing what FreeBSD (and possibly softupdates can do) Hope to provide some results soon. I shall be also trying on Linux boxes (On Linux, I am getting the following error) /tmp/cca010271.o: In function `cli_show': /tmp/cca010271.o(.text+0x1e3d): the `getwd' function is dangerous and should not be used. Cheers, Yusuf cc: Stephen Twiddle (ext3 fame) and Hans Reiser (Reiserfs fame) -- Yusuf Goolamabbas yusufg@huge.net To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message