From owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 30 16:46:59 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD57C106568B for ; Wed, 30 Sep 2009 16:46:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@optiksecurite.com) Received: from relais.videotron.ca (relais.videotron.ca [24.201.245.36]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 96ED68FC15 for ; Wed, 30 Sep 2009 16:46:59 +0000 (UTC) MIME-version: 1.0 Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Content-type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Received: from [69.69.69.193] ([24.201.201.211]) by VL-MO-MR005.ip.videotron.ca (Sun Java(tm) System Messaging Server 6.3-4.01 (built Aug 3 2007; 32bit)) with ESMTP id <0KQS00L7NJUAQF70@VL-MO-MR005.ip.videotron.ca> for freebsd-security@freebsd.org; Wed, 30 Sep 2009 11:46:58 -0400 (EDT) Message-id: <4AC37D6B.3060409@optiksecurite.com> Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2009 11:46:51 -0400 From: Martin Turgeon User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (Windows/20090812) To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Subject: Update on protection against slowloris X-BeenThere: freebsd-security@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Security issues \[members-only posting\]" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2009 16:46:59 -0000 Hi list! We tested mod_antiloris 0.4 and found it quite efficient, but before putting it in production, we would like to hear some feedback from freebsd users. We are using Apache 2.2.x on Freebsd 6.2 and 7.2. Is anyone using it? Do you have any other way to patch against Slowloris other than putting a proxy in front or using the HTTP accept filter? Thanks for your feedback, Martin