From owner-freebsd-questions Thu Jan 15 13:10:53 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id NAA11391 for questions-outgoing; Thu, 15 Jan 1998 13:10:53 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: (from jmb@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id NAA11239; Thu, 15 Jan 1998 13:09:12 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jmb) From: "Jonathan M. Bresler" Message-Id: <199801152109.NAA11239@hub.freebsd.org> Subject: Re: ELF In-Reply-To: <34BE6FBD.68625AB2@dal.net> from Studded at "Jan 15, 98 12:21:17 pm" To: Studded@dal.net (Studded) Date: Thu, 15 Jan 1998 13:09:12 -0800 (PST) Cc: leifn@image.dk, freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL32 (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk Studded wrote: > Leif Neland wrote: > > > > At 14 Jan 98 04:52:59 Doug White wrote regarding Re: as, binutils out of date? > > > > DW> binutils will not be in FreeBSD until we adopt ELF. I suggest > > DW> trying to port over the necessary changes from your gas to ours > > DW> and submit patches using send-pr. > > > > So what do I do with an elf'ed linux executable? The source isn't available. > > When I tried running, it complained about "unknown ELF-format" or something. > > (Sorry, I can only read/write messages while in dos) > > I've not done this myself, but as I understand it the correct procedure > is to use brandelf to stamp the executable on your system. Try man > brandelf. its very easy. brandelf -t Linux jmb