From owner-freebsd-smp Fri Nov 5 18:21:48 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-smp@freebsd.org Received: from dingo.cdrom.com (dingo.cdrom.com [204.216.28.145]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 064BD14D85 for ; Fri, 5 Nov 1999 18:21:46 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from mike@dingo.cdrom.com) Received: from dingo.cdrom.com (localhost.cdrom.com [127.0.0.1]) by dingo.cdrom.com (8.9.3/8.8.8) with ESMTP id SAA01384; Fri, 5 Nov 1999 18:10:53 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from mike@dingo.cdrom.com) Message-Id: <199911060210.SAA01384@dingo.cdrom.com> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.0.2 2/24/98 To: Tamiji Homma Cc: mike@smith.net.au, freebsd-smp@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Dual Celeron + FreeBSD? In-reply-to: Your message of "Fri, 05 Nov 1999 18:08:27 PST." <19991105180827P.thomma@baynetworks.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Fri, 05 Nov 1999 18:10:53 -0800 From: Mike Smith Sender: owner-freebsd-smp@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org > > > So, I should be happy about -current buildworld/world 49/54 > > > minutes with K6-III/550 on single IDE drive ;-) > > > > With those numbers you are probably cheating. That's about what I get > > with a K7/500, and it has a lot more bandwidth. > > Well, I'm not cheating. ;-) From experience to date, I find that fairly hard to believe. Most people that have claimed otherwise so far have subsequently been found or, or ignored. 8) > I wonder if how KryoTech K7/900MHz(300MHz L2 cache) K7/800MHz > (400MHz L2 cache) does? If/when we can convince KryoTech to send us machines for evaluation, we'll let you all know... -- \\ Give a man a fish, and you feed him for a day. \\ Mike Smith \\ Tell him he should learn how to fish himself, \\ msmith@freebsd.org \\ and he'll hate you for a lifetime. \\ msmith@cdrom.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-smp" in the body of the message