From owner-freebsd-security  Wed Aug 12 10:01:30 1998
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG>
Received: (from majordom@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id KAA25838
          for freebsd-security-outgoing; Wed, 12 Aug 1998 10:01:30 -0700 (PDT)
          (envelope-from owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG)
Received: from lariat.lariat.org (lariat.lariat.org [206.100.185.2])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id KAA25821
          for <freebsd-security@freebsd.org>; Wed, 12 Aug 1998 10:01:27 -0700 (PDT)
          (envelope-from brett@lariat.org)
Received: (from brett@localhost)
	by lariat.lariat.org (8.8.8/8.8.6) id LAA00346;
	Wed, 12 Aug 1998 11:00:59 -0600 (MDT)
Message-Id: <199808121700.LAA00346@lariat.lariat.org>
X-Sender: brett@127.0.0.1
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Pro Version 4.1.0.44 (Beta)
Date: Wed, 12 Aug 1998 11:00:53 -0600
To: freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG
From: Brett Glass <brett@lariat.org>
Subject: Re: UDP port 31337
In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.3.96.980812225354.21008E-100000@aniwa.sky>
References: <3.0.5.32.19980812112915.0092ead0@mail.scancall.no>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Sender: owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org

If someone's trying to BO you, they deserve worse.

How about a daemon that sends fatal packets back TO the machine running BO?
I'm sure that these punks haven't protected their code adequately against
buffer overflows, etc.

--Brett


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe security" in the body of the message