From owner-svn-src-head@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Oct 19 17:02:16 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-src-head@freebsd.org Received: by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 1033) id 51F63ECE; Fri, 19 Oct 2012 17:02:16 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2012 17:02:16 +0000 From: Alexey Dokuchaev To: Devin Teske Subject: Re: svn commit: r241701 - in head/usr.sbin/bsdconfig: . include share Message-ID: <20121019170216.GB92674@FreeBSD.org> References: <201210181843.q9IIhs6N099621@svn.freebsd.org> <20121019055442.GA9108@FreeBSD.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=koi8-r Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Cc: svn-src-head@freebsd.org, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, src-committers@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: svn-src-head@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: SVN commit messages for the src tree for head/-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2012 17:02:16 -0000 On Fri, Oct 19, 2012 at 08:22:36AM -0700, Devin Teske wrote: > On Oct 18, 2012, at 10:54 PM, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote: > > How come that new dialog(1) lacks functionality of the old one? > > SVN r217309 brought in cdialog to replace our the [unmaintained] dialog. > > cdialog is different, but mostly compatible with its predecessor. Ah, I guess it might explain the shitty colors I see on newish FreeBSD screenshots of dialog(1). > The benefits of cdialog far out-weigh the few problems that were reported > (and then quickly fixed). OK, but do we plan to retain the look of original dialog(1)? ./danfe