Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 19 Oct 2012 17:02:16 +0000
From:      Alexey Dokuchaev <danfe@FreeBSD.org>
To:        Devin Teske <dteske@freebsd.org>
Cc:        svn-src-head@freebsd.org, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, src-committers@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: svn commit: r241701 - in head/usr.sbin/bsdconfig: . include share
Message-ID:  <20121019170216.GB92674@FreeBSD.org>
In-Reply-To: <D15CE1CB-E484-4C46-8304-60437EFEBC7D@fisglobal.com>
References:  <201210181843.q9IIhs6N099621@svn.freebsd.org> <20121019055442.GA9108@FreeBSD.org> <D15CE1CB-E484-4C46-8304-60437EFEBC7D@fisglobal.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, Oct 19, 2012 at 08:22:36AM -0700, Devin Teske wrote:
> On Oct 18, 2012, at 10:54 PM, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote:
> > How come that new dialog(1) lacks functionality of the old one?
> 
> SVN r217309 brought in cdialog to replace our the [unmaintained] dialog.
> 
> cdialog is different, but mostly compatible with its predecessor.

Ah, I guess it might explain the shitty colors I see on newish FreeBSD
screenshots of dialog(1).

> The benefits of cdialog far out-weigh the few problems that were reported
> (and then quickly fixed).

OK, but do we plan to retain the look of original dialog(1)?

./danfe



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20121019170216.GB92674>