From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Aug 20 12:22:48 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 69DAC1065672; Mon, 20 Aug 2012 12:22:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Received: from mx02.qsc.de (mx02.qsc.de [213.148.130.14]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 27FEB8FC0A; Mon, 20 Aug 2012 12:22:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: from r56.edvax.de (port-92-195-49-179.dynamic.qsc.de [92.195.49.179]) by mx02.qsc.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 70F962481E; Mon, 20 Aug 2012 14:22:46 +0200 (CEST) Received: from r56.edvax.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by r56.edvax.de (8.14.5/8.14.5) with SMTP id q7KCMjnK002085; Mon, 20 Aug 2012 14:22:45 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2012 14:22:45 +0200 From: Polytropon To: Matthew Seaman Message-Id: <20120820142245.7d4830dc.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: <5031CD59.9080103@FreeBSD.org> References: <20120819213854.50408ec7.freebsd@edvax.de> <20120819232754.641a7eb2.freebsd@edvax.de> <86k3wuw99t.fsf@red.stonehenge.com> <5031CD59.9080103@FreeBSD.org> Organization: EDVAX X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.1.1 (GTK+ 2.24.5; i386-portbld-freebsd8.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: I Can Has Packages? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Polytropon List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2012 12:22:48 -0000 On Mon, 20 Aug 2012 06:38:33 +0100, Matthew Seaman wrote: > I always keep saying the ideal > situation would be that you could customise and compile just your own > really mission critical software and freely mix that with installing > pre-compiled packages of anything else from the public repositories. To be honest, that's what I'm doing for many years now. I tend to compile only those ports where it is either required in order to obtain the software because no suitable package does exist (e. g. OpenOffice), or because I intendedly want to have access to compile-time options (e. g. mplayer), which can also apply when specific optimization is needed in order to get something into a usable state on older hardware. For everything else, packages are fine. Mixing those forms (and maybe assuming that ports can be either handled by the native "make method" or one of the port management tools such as portmaster) is possible. Of course you have to think first, then do, but I assume it's not needed mentioning. :-) -- Polytropon Magdeburg, Germany Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ...