Date: Fri, 06 Feb 2015 17:32:50 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 196097] [MAINTAINER] Update sysutils/tlsdate to 0.0.11 Message-ID: <bug-196097-13-RiU0AtuMvl@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> In-Reply-To: <bug-196097-13@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> References: <bug-196097-13@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196097 --- Comment #3 from John Marino <marino@FreeBSD.org> --- (In reply to fk from comment #2) > Sorry, I don't use poudriere and test with DEVELOPER=yes > which doesn't complain about this. which just proved that DEVELOPER=yes is inferior > In my opinion that poudriere check isn't particular useful, > but arguing about that is probably pointless. Yes, it's pointless. If there's not guideline that stagedir and pkg-plist will match, a big QA test is lost. More importantly, the port is considered failed if it doesn't pass the test so it's an academic discussion. > Anyway, the updated patch hopefully fixes the poudriere complaint. Without any kind of test log, not even "make check-plist ; make stage-qa", how is a person reviewing the PR supposed to know if it fixes it or not? (hopefully your answer isn't "download it and run it through poudriere yourself"). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-196097-13-RiU0AtuMvl>