From owner-freebsd-ports Mon Sep 14 18:36:04 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id SAA05691 for freebsd-ports-outgoing; Mon, 14 Sep 1998 18:36:04 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from sicily.odyssey.cs.cmu.edu (SICILY.ODYSSEY.CS.CMU.EDU [128.2.185.138]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with SMTP id SAA05597; Mon, 14 Sep 1998 18:36:00 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from rvb@sicily.odyssey.cs.cmu.edu) From: rvb@sicily.odyssey.cs.cmu.edu To: obrien@NUXI.com Cc: Satoshi Asami , ports@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: /usr/ports/filesystems References: <199809142313.QAA03530@vader.cs.berkeley.edu> <19980914182949.B17745@nuxi.com> Date: 14 Sep 1998 21:35:28 -0400 In-Reply-To: David O'Brien's message of Mon, 14 Sep 1998 18:29:49 -0700 Message-ID: Lines: 15 X-Mailer: Gnus v5.4.46/Emacs 19.34 Source-Info: Sender is really rvb@sicily.odyssey.cs.cmu.edu Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org David O'Brien writes: > > * Lastly, I prefer the longer name, filesystems, to something like fs > > * which I think is too cryptic. > > > > I think filesystems is fine in this case. I'm all for saving letters > > but it doesn't have to go all the way down to 2 bytes. ;) > > filesys I hate abbreviations, especially new ones. It really has to be either fs or filesystems, otherwise its too confusing. > > -- > -- David (obrien@NUXI.com -or- obrien@FreeBSD.org) To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message