From owner-freebsd-arch  Thu May  2 23: 0:37 2002
Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org
Received: from rwcrmhc53.attbi.com (rwcrmhc53.attbi.com [204.127.198.39])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C293137B416
	for <arch@FreeBSD.ORG>; Thu,  2 May 2002 23:00:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from InterJet.elischer.org ([12.232.206.8])
          by rwcrmhc53.attbi.com
          (InterMail vM.4.01.03.27 201-229-121-127-20010626) with ESMTP
          id <20020503060033.NCDB5896.rwcrmhc53.attbi.com@InterJet.elischer.org>;
          Fri, 3 May 2002 06:00:33 +0000
Received: from localhost (localhost.elischer.org [127.0.0.1])
	by InterJet.elischer.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id WAA80947;
	Thu, 2 May 2002 22:59:54 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Thu, 2 May 2002 22:59:53 -0700 (PDT)
From: Julian Elischer <julian@elischer.org>
To: Bruce Evans <bde@zeta.org.au>
Cc: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@critter.freebsd.dk>,
	Dag-Erling Smorgrav <des@ofug.org>, arch@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: deperlifying sockstat(1) 
In-Reply-To: <20020503034140.C4801-100000@gamplex.bde.org>
Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0205022258430.80897-100000@InterJet.elischer.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
List-ID: <freebsd-arch.FreeBSD.ORG>
List-Archive: <http://docs.freebsd.org/mail/> (Web Archive)
List-Help: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=help> (List Instructions)
List-Subscribe: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=subscribe%20freebsd-arch>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=unsubscribe%20freebsd-arch>
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

I have used it from time to time
with Netstat and fstat to try find which process had the suspect session..


On Fri, 3 May 2002, Bruce Evans wrote:

> On Wed, 1 May 2002, Julian Elischer wrote:
> 
> > On Thu, 2 May 2002, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
> >
> > > In message <xzp8z73pjh6.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no>, Dag-Erling Smorgrav writes:
> > > >I'm working on a C version of sockstat(1), and to complete it I need
> > > >to do nasty stuff like using libkvm and defining _KERNEL before
> > > >including some headers (see fstat).  I'm starting to think that it
> > > >would be easier to just make a kern.sockstat sysctl node, and make
> > > >sockstat(1) a #!/bin/sh wrapper around sysctl(8).  Ideas?
> > >
> > > sysctl is way better than libkvm because it provides a chance
> > > for presentation.
> >
> > unless sockstat gets a -N -M capacity such as teh other similar programs..
> 
> Who uses this?  No one complained when it was broken for vmstat -m.
> 
> Bruce
> 
> 


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message