From owner-freebsd-questions Wed Nov 27 14:29:39 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 836D737B401 for ; Wed, 27 Nov 2002 14:29:37 -0800 (PST) Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (adsl-64-169-106-47.dsl.lsan03.pacbell.net [64.169.106.47]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2598E43EAF for ; Wed, 27 Nov 2002 14:29:36 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from rot13.obsecurity.org (rot13.obsecurity.org [10.0.0.5]) by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 99D9066C61; Wed, 27 Nov 2002 14:29:35 -0800 (PST) Received: by rot13.obsecurity.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 1558412E2; Wed, 27 Nov 2002 14:29:35 -0800 (PST) Date: Wed, 27 Nov 2002 14:29:35 -0800 From: Kris Kennaway To: Brian Jackson Cc: Kris Kennaway , paul beard , Clint Olsen , questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: 4.7 changes to /bin/sh? Message-ID: <20021127222934.GA25932@rot13.obsecurity.org> References: <20021127065640.GA20089@rot13.obsecurity.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="nFreZHaLTZJo0R7j" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG --nFreZHaLTZJo0R7j Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Nov 27, 2002 at 09:31:33AM -0500, Brian Jackson wrote: >=20 > On Wednesday, November 27, 2002, at 01:56 AM, Kris Kennaway wrote: > > > >I already told you in the section of my mail you deleted. > > > >Kris > > > > > > >=20 > No, it's the "& &&" construction, which is illegal and should never > have been allowed. Update to the latest version of the port and > submit a PR if the bug persists. >=20 > Kris >=20 >=20 > I guess I didn't understand your answer (above) to the question "What=20 > changed?". If the port was broken from the get go, I think it was odd=20 > that I only noticed that the database on my server wasn't starting=20 > after my upgrade to 4.7 (which of course very well may have been the=20 > case :) /bin/sh no longer allows the illegal construct (see the release notes). Kris --nFreZHaLTZJo0R7j Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQE95UdOWry0BWjoQKURAoz0AKCsRzIqNiCIMRXPIfepEQY+E/DW6wCglGZx jzmcyKIkXP9gZrV+IaHG978= =Wvdb -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nFreZHaLTZJo0R7j-- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message