From owner-freebsd-isp  Thu Apr 10 12:30:14 1997
Return-Path: <owner-isp>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id MAA25262
          for isp-outgoing; Thu, 10 Apr 1997 12:30:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from buffnet4.buffnet.net (buffnet4.buffnet.net [205.246.19.13])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id MAA25257
          for <freebsd-isp@freebsd.org>; Thu, 10 Apr 1997 12:30:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from buffnet11.buffnet.net (shovey@buffnet11.buffnet.net [205.246.19.55]) by buffnet4.buffnet.net (8.7.5/8.7.3) with SMTP id PAA01090; Thu, 10 Apr 1997 15:30:04 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Thu, 10 Apr 1997 15:30:03 -0400 (EDT)
From: Steve <shovey@buffnet.net>
To: Chris Bura <chris@main.netcorps.com>
cc: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Sprint or MCI ??
In-Reply-To: <199704101707.KAA26278@main.netcorps.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.BSI.3.95.970410152852.3046C-100000@buffnet11.buffnet.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-isp@freebsd.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

On Thu, 10 Apr 1997, Chris Bura wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> We're trying to decide between Sprint or MCI for our T1 service.
> They both have the good sales pitches.  
> 
> 	Sprint says they're all IP and MCI mixes frame with IP.
> 	MCI says they have 40% of the internet traffic.

I only have experience with uunet, and sprint - and I like sprint.  They
give you a full T1, not a stuffed one, and arent down much.  They have had
troubles in the past - everybody does.