Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2007 13:39:29 -0600 From: "Andrew Falanga" <af300wsm@gmail.com> To: "Lowell Gilbert" <freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org> Cc: freebsd-questions <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: samba and IPv6 Message-ID: <340a29540706141239xa30c41fnff8b2bb1f31a9489@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <44645q74hd.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> References: <340a29540706141117o3584f1adid95e240fcbabcd72@mail.gmail.com> <44645q74hd.fsf@be-well.ilk.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 6/14/07, Lowell Gilbert <freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org> wrote: > "Andrew Falanga" <af300wsm@gmail.com> writes: > > > Does samba actually support this? I'm not turning up much information > > from the "official HOW-TO" at samba.org. In fact, not a single link > > in the HOW-TO even mentions IPv6. > > There's a link on the Samba front page from last week. > The short version is that it doesn't do it yet, and probably won't > until Samba 4 (which has other changes for interoperating with > Vista -- which is the first Windows to really do IPv6 well). > There are patch sets around if you're willing to get your hands > a bit dirty. Nope, don't mind getting my hands dirty (I do most of the work on my automobiles too). However, I take it from this that because I must get my hands dirty, none of these patches are in the ports system? I ask because I noticed as I installed vim last night that many patches were downloaded along with the main vim tar-ball. Andy
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?340a29540706141239xa30c41fnff8b2bb1f31a9489>