From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Apr 17 02:00:40 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2501D37B401 for ; Thu, 17 Apr 2003 02:00:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: from tokyo.ccrle.nec.de (tokyo.ccrle.nec.de [195.37.70.2]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C28FF43FB1 for ; Thu, 17 Apr 2003 02:00:38 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from Martin.Stiemerling@ccrle.nec.de) Received: from venus.office (venus.office [10.1.1.11]) by tokyo.ccrle.nec.de (8.12.9/8.12.8) with ESMTP id h3H90aVI020414; Thu, 17 Apr 2003 11:00:37 +0200 (CEST) Received: from ccrle.nec.de (n-stiemerling.office [10.1.1.109]) by venus.office (Postfix on SuSE Linux eMail Server 3.0) with ESMTP id 6422FE568; Thu, 17 Apr 2003 10:56:16 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <3E9E6D34.5020100@ccrle.nec.de> Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2003 11:00:36 +0200 From: Martin Stiemerling Organization: NEC -- Network Labs Europe User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.0rc3) Gecko/20020619 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Daniel Lang References: <20030417072027.GA38782@atrbg11.informatik.tu-muenchen.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: IPfilter changes? X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2003 09:00:40 -0000 Hi Daniel, Daniel Lang wrote: > Hi folks, > > I've noticed some change of behaviour with IPFilter > in my 4.8-RC2 system after the upgrade. It seems that > a more recent version of ipfilter was imported then, > so maybe something may have changed indeed. What version is used in 4.8-RC2? I'm using 4.8-RELEASE with IPFilter 3.4.31 and it works with UDP and keep state quite fine. > > Maybe it was never intended to work for UDP? Or maybe the state > timings have changed? Yes, it is intended to have UDP and keep state, it is a nice feature of IP Filter! Gruß Martin -- Martin Stiemerling NEC Europe Ltd. -- Network Laboratories Stiemerling@ccrle.nec.de IPv4: http://www.ccrle.nec.de IPv6: http://www.ipv6.ccrle.nec.de