From owner-freebsd-stable Sun Oct 8 23:45:56 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from beoclu-01.phy.gasou.edu (beoclu-01.phy.GaSoU.edu [141.165.40.55]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 25C0E37B502 for ; Sun, 8 Oct 2000 23:45:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: from janus.main.gsbcnet (janus.main.gsbcnet [192.168.0.1]) by beoclu-01.phy.gasou.edu (8.11.0/8.11.0) with ESMTP id e996jn408047; Mon, 9 Oct 2000 02:45:49 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from sdodson@beoclu-01.phy.gasou.edu) Date: Mon, 9 Oct 2000 02:45:49 -0400 (EDT) From: Scott Dodson To: Warner Losh Cc: Jon Paterson , "'freebsd-stable@freebsd.org'" Subject: Re: Correct sequence for keeping a 4.1 system stable. In-Reply-To: <200010090642.AAA09488@harmony.village.org> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Mon, 9 Oct 2000, Warner Losh wrote: > The updating that I quoted was for 4.0->newer. I've not had problems > with it. Last time I upgraded a 3.5 system to 4.1-stable I had lots > of problems similar to what your long message described working > around. I've not had time to update UPDATING and to test things out. > Hmm, I don't know why. Those problems were going from 4.0 -> 4.1.1 and going from 4.1 -> 4.1.1 on another machine. If it happened on just one machine i wouldn't rase a question. But his is happening on both, however of course I'm the one that's done both the machines. But i don't think i've screwd anything else up. -scott To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message