From owner-freebsd-alpha@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jul 29 12:41:38 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-alpha@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 649EE37B401; Tue, 29 Jul 2003 12:41:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: from freebie.xs4all.nl (freebie.xs4all.nl [213.84.32.253]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7749743F75; Tue, 29 Jul 2003 12:41:36 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from wkb@freebie.xs4all.nl) Received: from freebie.xs4all.nl (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freebie.xs4all.nl (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id h6TJfZCE006817; Tue, 29 Jul 2003 21:41:35 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from wkb@freebie.xs4all.nl) Received: (from wkb@localhost) by freebie.xs4all.nl (8.12.9/8.12.9/Submit) id h6TJfZrZ006816; Tue, 29 Jul 2003 21:41:35 +0200 (CEST) Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2003 21:41:35 +0200 From: Wilko Bulte To: Ruslan Ermilov Message-ID: <20030729194135.GJ6508@freebie.xs4all.nl> References: <20030722081738.GB7811@sunbay.com> <20030729095436.GB7617@sunbay.com> <20030729173848.GE4940@freebie.xs4all.nl> <20030729192343.GB66399@sunbay.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20030729192343.GB66399@sunbay.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i X-OS: FreeBSD 4.8-STABLE X-PGP: finger wilko@freebsd.org cc: Marcel Moolenaar cc: Wilko Bulte cc: Scott Long cc: alpha@FreeBSD.ORG cc: David O'Brien cc: Poul-Henning Kamp Subject: Re: Floppies for ALPHA X-BeenThere: freebsd-alpha@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the Alpha List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2003 19:41:38 -0000 On Tue, Jul 29, 2003 at 10:23:43PM +0300, Ruslan Ermilov wrote: > On Tue, Jul 29, 2003 at 07:38:48PM +0200, Wilko Bulte wrote: > > On Tue, Jul 29, 2003 at 12:54:36PM +0300, Ruslan Ermilov wrote: > [...] > > > I've got that feeling that the consensus was to drop the floppy > > > support for Alpha, as supporting it becomes a nightmare. If so, > > > > Yes, that consensus seems to be there. Finally.. :) > > > > > I also get comments that only ISOs aka mandatory CDboot is not > > acceptable. > > > Sure. We need to provide the loss of functionality. Please see > my other reply to an earlier message in this same thread, which > has more appropriate context for this. > > > Other than that I think the patch does what you intend it to do. > > > Thanks, it sure does. :-) > But does that also mean that you'd feel comfortable if I committed > it now? I think beter now than really close to the release. But there might be other views maybe? -- | / o / /_ _ wkb@freebie.xs4all.nl |/|/ / / /( (_) Bulte