From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Sep 11 23:58:36 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from hq1.tyfon.net (hq1.tyfon.net [213.212.29.17]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D314237B42C for ; Mon, 11 Sep 2000 23:58:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by hq1.tyfon.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D4521C7BD; Tue, 12 Sep 2000 08:58:31 +0200 (CEST) Date: Tue, 12 Sep 2000 08:58:31 +0200 (CEST) From: Dan Larsson To: "Chad R. Larson" Cc: fjoe@iclub.nsu.ru, stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: remote 3.5 -> 4.1-STABLE source upgrade (updated) In-Reply-To: <200009111738.KAA27347@freeway.dcfinc.com> Message-ID: Organization: Tyfon Svenska AB MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Mon, 11 Sep 2000, Chad R. Larson wrote: | As I recall, Dan Larsson wrote: | > | > I am about to upgrade a 3.5-STABLE machine to 4.1-STABLE... | | Why? | | Not being a wise-ass (and not saying I can't be), but what features | in 4.1 not in 3.5 are driving your decision? It's a bsd box running as router, I would like to prepare it for IPv6 when it becomes available. Besides IPv6, it's the only box running 3.? at that location. I have done 3.? to 4.?-S the shutdown-to-single-usermode way successfully on an other machines so I know it works that way. The one in question isn't at arms lenght so to speak, so a remote upgrade would be the most preferred solution. | -crl Regards +------ Dan Larsson | Tel: +46 8 550 120 21 Tyfon Svenska AB | Fax: +46 8 550 120 02 GPG and PGP keys | finger dl@hq1.tyfon.net To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message