From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 2 08:54:56 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 32CB237B401 for ; Wed, 2 Jul 2003 08:54:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail.svzserv.kemerovo.su (mail.svzserv.kemerovo.su [213.184.65.66]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF96443FBD for ; Wed, 2 Jul 2003 08:54:53 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from eugen@grosbein.pp.ru) Received: from main.svzserv.kemerovo.su (root@hq.svzserv.kemerovo.su [213.184.65.65])h62FsnPZ055776; Wed, 2 Jul 2003 23:54:49 +0800 (NKZS) (envelope-from eugen@grosbein.pp.ru) Received: from grosbein.pp.ru (D00015.dialonly.kemerovo.su [213.184.66.105]) h62FskwQ023979; Wed, 2 Jul 2003 23:54:47 +0800 (NKZS) (envelope-from eugen@grosbein.pp.ru) Received: from grosbein.pp.ru (eugen@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by grosbein.pp.ru (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id h62Fsi0i001802; Wed, 2 Jul 2003 23:54:44 +0800 (KRAST) (envelope-from eugen@grosbein.pp.ru) Received: (from eugen@localhost) by grosbein.pp.ru (8.12.9/8.12.9/Submit) id h62Fsgg6001801; Wed, 2 Jul 2003 23:54:42 +0800 (KRAST) Date: Wed, 2 Jul 2003 23:54:42 +0800 From: Eugene Grosbein To: Michael Sierchio Message-ID: <20030702235442.A1757@grosbein.pp.ru> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <3F02E5F2.4090407@tenebras.com> cc: net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ipprecedence X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 Jul 2003 15:54:56 -0000 > It seems to me you could use dummynet/ipfw2 to provide a > stronge PREFERENCE for packets w/non-zero precedence -- > the fairness aspect of dummynet queues works against your > stated aim, but probabilistically you could pass all > such packets ahead of others. The fairness guarantee > means that, even if you had a steady stream of non-zero > precedence packets, some others would be transmitted. And what bandwidth of pipe should I use? Note that I do not need traffic shaping, I need to rearrange queues only. Eugene P.S. Please CC: me as I'm not in the list.