From owner-freebsd-ports  Tue Sep 23 06:00:07 1997
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ports>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id GAA09557
          for ports-outgoing; Tue, 23 Sep 1997 06:00:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (from gnats@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id GAA09523;
          Tue, 23 Sep 1997 06:00:01 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Tue, 23 Sep 1997 06:00:01 -0700 (PDT)
Message-Id: <199709231300.GAA09523@hub.freebsd.org>
To: freebsd-ports
Cc: 
From: Wolfram Schneider <wosch@cs.tu-berlin.de>
Subject: Re: ports/4608: Incorrect packing list for Mutt port
Reply-To: Wolfram Schneider <wosch@cs.tu-berlin.de>
Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

The following reply was made to PR ports/4608; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Wolfram Schneider <wosch@cs.tu-berlin.de>
To: fports@jraynard.demon.co.uk
Cc: FreeBSD-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: ports/4608: Incorrect packing list for Mutt port
Date: 23 Sep 1997 13:23:26 +0200

 James Raynard <fports@jraynard.demon.co.uk> writes:
 > PS For what it's worth, I think --enable-hidden-host should be disabled
 > by default (perhaps set by an option?) for consistency with all the
 > other MTUs in ports, if my memory serves correctly.  It took me quite
 > a while to realise I was sending out mail with an invalid 'From' address...
 
 Agreed, I had the same problem. --enable-hidden-host is a
 dangerous option.
 
 -- 
 Wolfram Schneider   <wosch@apfel.de>   http://www.apfel.de/~wosch/