Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 4 Oct 2017 14:17:46 +0200
From:      Mathieu Arnold <mat@FreeBSD.org>
To:        David Chisnall <theraven@FreeBSD.org>, Ryan Steinmetz <zi@FreeBSD.org>
Cc:        Cy Schubert <Cy.Schubert@komquats.com>, Mathieu Arnold <mat@FreeBSD.org>,  "ports-committers@freebsd.org" <ports-committers@freebsd.org>, "svn-ports-all@freebsd.org" <svn-ports-all@freebsd.org>, "svn-ports-head@freebsd.org" <svn-ports-head@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: svn commit: r450898 - head/security/vuxml
Message-ID:  <493386ff-dc20-b8cb-001d-ea8b79ae1129@FreeBSD.org>
In-Reply-To: <31BE1638-3115-4F25-810C-5CB91626E480@FreeBSD.org>
References:  <zi@FreeBSD.org> <20171003185229.GA91081@exodus.zi0r.com> <201710031914.v93JESd2007316@slippy.cwsent.com> <20171003191620.GA99159@exodus.zi0r.com> <31BE1638-3115-4F25-810C-5CB91626E480@FreeBSD.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Le 04/10/2017 =C3=A0 13:37, David Chisnall a =C3=A9crit=C2=A0:
> On 3 Oct 2017, at 20:16, Ryan Steinmetz <zi@FreeBSD.org> wrote:
>>
>> On (10/03/17 12:14), Cy Schubert wrote:
>>> In message <20171003185229.GA91081@exodus.zi0r.com>, Ryan Steinmetz w=
rites:
>>>>
>>>> On (10/03/17 11:36), Cy Schubert wrote:
>>>>> Really?
>>>>>
>>>>> Looking at the code it's a 1m size limit. Put yourself in sizelimit=
=2Econf and
>>>> you get 10x that, unless you put a size after your name.
>>>>
>>>> Typo--is a transaction size limit that was triggered.
>>> Yes.
>>>
>>> Why delete the old entries? It's history.
>>>
>>> Maybe we shouldn't keep the vuxml database in the ports tree, instead=

>>> hosting the vuxml file on github instead of the port itself??? Just a=

>>> thought.
>>>
>> We (ports-secteam) were addressing a problem (people couldn't commit n=
ew entries).
>>
>> There is some investigative work going on now that will give us more o=
ptions in terms of dealing with growth.
>>
>> More information will surface in the near future.
> In retrospect, it seems that putting this as a single file in the ports=
 tree was a bad idea, and the correct solution is to have individual XML =
fragments that can be assembled into both one huge file of everything and=
 a smaller one for vulnerabilities in ports that have been shipped in the=
 last year.

This is the idea, yes, split it in yearly, quarterly, or montly files.
If only someone were to do it :-) (and make sure vuxml.org still works,
and stuff.)

--=20
Mathieu Arnold





Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?493386ff-dc20-b8cb-001d-ea8b79ae1129>